cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "White, Kim" <Kim.Wh...@netapp.com>
Subject Re: Name approval request - NetApp Virtual Storage Console for CloudStack
Date Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:09:35 GMT
Thank you for the quick response.

Kim


Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <chipchilders@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:55:55AM -0500, Shane Curcuru wrote:
>> Please see our FAQ for software product names using Apache brands:
>> 
>>  http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#poweredby
>> 
>> Note that alternate separator phrases besides "Powered By" are
>> acceptable when the meaning of the phrase (or word) is clear from
>> the context of the specific relationship between a third party's
>> software product and the Apache product.
>> 
>> I'm not familiar with the CloudStack plugin model, but if Chip and
>> the CloudStack PMC are happy with the name in terms of how "for"
>> clearly fits within how plugins are developed and used, then it's
>> fine with me.
> 
> "for" seems like a very reasonable separator to me.  I'm +1 on this.
> 
>> 
>> Note: as Chip notes, the use of the full "Apache CloudStack" name is
>> required.
>> 
>> - Shane Curcuru
>>  VP, Brand Management
>>  The Apache Software Foundation

Mime
View raw message