cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Powered By Logo
Date Thu, 03 Oct 2013 15:05:03 GMT
All great points in this thread - thanks!


On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 06:24:58AM -0400, Christopher Swenson wrote:
> I also like version 2.  Agree with the reverse black and white.
> 
> What about "powered by" up top and "apache CloudStack" on bottom.
> Enlarge the letters for those and shrink CloudStack.apache.org to very
> small print under "Apache CloudStack"
> 
> The powered by and apache CloudStack letters should be very prominent
> on the logo IMHO.  The site, not so much.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> Chris Swenson
> Mobile: +1-404-281-5954
> Twitter/Skype/YIM: cpswen
> 
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Kelly Hair <kelly.hair@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Good point about 3 colors!
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/2/13 4:17 PM, "White, Kim" <Kim.White@netapp.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The option 2 is a cleaner design.
> >> How about version 2 but reverse the black and white?
> >> Make the background white and the lettering black.
> >>
> >> If you can get to 3 colors (with one being black or white) it is
> >> easier/less expensive to replicate on physical things.
> >>
> >> --kim
> >>
> >> Kim White
> >> NetApp
> >> 408.822.3125 Direct
> >> 925.998.4252 Mobile
> >> kim.white@netapp.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 12:56 PM
> >> To: <marketing@cloudstack.apache.org>
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Powered By Logo
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've taken the liberty of creating 2 options for a "Powered By" logo for
> >> CloudStack.
> >>
> >> http://84.51.246.11/poweredby/poweredbyversion1.png
> >>
> >> http://84.51.246.11/poweredby/poweredbyversion2.png
> >>
> >> They are the same basic design, with some color adjustments.
> >>
> >> I'm looking for feedback - good, bad, whatever - on direction and / or the
> >> two options I'm proposing.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> -chip
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message