Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of mathias.mullins@citrix.com
 designates 66.165.176.63 as permitted sender)
From: Mathias Mullins <mathias.mullins@citrix.com>
To: "marketing@cloudstack.apache.org" <marketing@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement
Thread-Topic: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement
Thread-Index: AQHOpcKc00OQKSOgGEWsldeMsc8RW5muscEAgBKuNgCAARlegP//wzAA
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:26:08 +0000
Message-ID: <CE574725.15156%mathias.mullins@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CALCN99U91qb5GfrZOmgoBtTMmsY0bfASKu=aTig8bHvX0xYWTA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8796DA150BF52C4FA9962BBE11CEF174@citrix.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Great fixes Tracy!

Much appreciated,
Matt=20


On 9/12/13 10:03 AM, "Tracy Phillips" <tracphil@mantoso.com> wrote:

>Matt,
>
>I made a few tweaks, if you don't like them, please feel free to revert
>back to the original.
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mathias Mullins
><mathias.mullins@citrix.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Ok here's my first draft. Please edit boldly.
>>
>> Understand I intentionally tried to expand this one as I'M hoping these
>> announcements will not only say we are putting out the next release but
>> help to bring in more people, show them the width and breath of the
>> product (like support from major players like Cisco) and get us some
>>more
>> press coverage and more adoption.
>>
>> I know we usually keep this sweet and simple, but I think we need to up
>> our message as well and show the maturity in our announcements as well.
>>
>>=20
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Release+Announ
>>ce
>> ment
>>
>> Let me know what you think.
>> Matt
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/30/13 8:00 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Absolutely!
>> >
>> >However, as for formal, take a look at the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0
>>announcements.
>> > They aren't press releases either.  IMO 4.2.0 doesn't warrant one of
>>he
>> >*limited* press releases that the ASF has available.  That doesn't mean
>> >that it won't get sent out to announce@a.o.  But that's different from
>>a
>> >formal press release.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mathias Mullins
>> ><mathias.mullins@citrix.com
>> >> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Should we be working on putting together the release statement for
>>4.2?
>> >> Since this is a Feature release, do we also want it in Press Release
>> >>format
>> >> to go out over announce@apache?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Matt
>> >>
>>
>>