cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement
Date Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:03:05 GMT
Well 1900+ is still true but it covers all the transient issues for features developed during
4.2.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mullins@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 7:09 AM
> To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement
> 
> That's fine. I thought 1900 was a bit excessive.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> 
> On 9/25/13 1:12 AM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> 
> >Mathias
> >
> >Sorry for this late comment but I am thinking instead of calling out
> >fixing over 1900 issues many of which are the issues that were found
> >and fixed in 4.2.0., should we instead say 160+ issues from 4.1.0 and
> >4.1.1 were fixed [1]. The end user does not care about the transient
> >issues for features developed in 4.2
> >
> >
> >[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/#?filter=12324870
> >
> >Thanks
> >Animesh
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:mathias.mullins@citrix.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 7:26 AM
> >> To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [ACS42] 4.2 Release Statement
> >>
> >> Great fixes Tracy!
> >>
> >> Much appreciated,
> >> Matt
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/12/13 10:03 AM, "Tracy Phillips" <tracphil@mantoso.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Matt,
> >> >
> >> >I made a few tweaks, if you don't like them, please feel free to
> >> >revert back to the original.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Mathias Mullins
> >> ><mathias.mullins@citrix.com
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Ok here's my first draft. Please edit boldly.
> >> >>
> >> >> Understand I intentionally tried to expand this one as I'M hoping
> >> >>these  announcements will not only say we are putting out the next
> >> >>release but  help to bring in more people, show them the width and
> >> >>breath of the  product (like support from major players like Cisco)
> >> >>and get us some more  press coverage and more adoption.
> >> >>
> >> >> I know we usually keep this sweet and simple, but I think we need
> >> >> to up our message as well and show the maturity in our
> >> >> announcements as
> >> well.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/4.2+Release+
> >> >>Ann
> >> >>oun
> >> >>ce
> >> >> ment
> >> >>
> >> >> Let me know what you think.
> >> >> Matt
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On 8/30/13 8:00 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Absolutely!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >However, as for formal, take a look at the 4.0.0 and 4.1.0
> >> >>announcements.
> >> >> > They aren't press releases either.  IMO 4.2.0 doesn't warrant
> >> >> > one of
> >> >>he
> >> >> >*limited* press releases that the ASF has available.  That
> >> >> >doesn't mean that it won't get sent out to announce@a.o.  But
> >> >> >that's different from
> >> >>a
> >> >> >formal press release.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Mathias Mullins
> >> >> ><mathias.mullins@citrix.com
> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Should we be working on putting together the release statement
> >> >> >> for
> >> >>4.2?
> >> >> >> Since this is a Feature release, do we also want it in Press
> >> >> >>Release format  to go out over announce@apache?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> Matt
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >


Mime
View raw message