Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5723D0DB for ; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75313 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2013 18:38:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 75193 invoked by uid 500); 30 May 2013 18:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 75161 invoked by uid 99); 30 May 2013 18:38:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown mxmx:stratosec-co.mail.eo.outlook.comip4:184.172.14.119~all (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of jlk@stratosec.co) Received: from [207.46.163.158] (HELO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (207.46.163.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:38 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB120.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.214.28) by BLUPR05MB118.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.214.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.698.13; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:15 +0000 Received: from BLUPR05MB120.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.3]) by BLUPR05MB120.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.3]) with mapi id 15.00.0698.010; Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:15 +0000 From: John Kinsella To: "" Subject: Re: cloudstack survey [discuss] Thread-Topic: cloudstack survey [discuss] Thread-Index: Ac5cfUIX0kkSWsPnTM+6pJcxMLpQ2wAAtfIAAAA02yAAArGrgAAmkrXAAA1Sk4AAABsegAAAMLoAAAB9noAAAZo7AA== Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 18:38:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20130530175221.GO52702@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> In-Reply-To: <20130530175221.GO52702@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [173.13.149.45] x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI;SFS:;DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:-1;SRVR:BLUPR05MB118;H:BLUPR05MB120.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: stratosec.co X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On May 30, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > My concern about user info is that we are going to ask as many people as > possible to answer the survey. I agree a bit about a desire to de-dupe > the company names... But I would *not* assume that the individuals that > may offer this are authorized to be public about their use of the > software. If we end up collecting them (for the record, I'm +0 on > collecting *just* organization name), I'd state in absolute terms that th= e > names are not shared on any public list (including this one). Maybe offer to delete identifying information once we de-dupe (e.g. "within= 15 days of end of survey")? > Giles - one other question for you... if you end up doing this, are you > going to spend the $ on a non-free plan? It looks like it would only > cost $24 for one month of the "Select" plan, which gives unlimited > questions and answers for a month. I think that allows for enough > answers to make it meaningful. >=20 > Alternatively, I'm personally willing to spend the $ myself to do this. > I'd hope for more than 100 answers. Same here