cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Musayev, Ilya" <imusa...@webmd.net>
Subject RE: cloudstack survey [discuss]
Date Thu, 30 May 2013 17:32:51 GMT
> > I think we *have* to get company name,etc. We need it to know whos
> > responded, to avoid duplicates and also we need to cross match against
> > other,known, users
> 
> I disagree. I'm really not in favor of collecting personal data.

Many big companies wont disclose their use of CS, if we make this part optional, at least
they can give us an idea on the size of the company, implementation and general industry.

This is better than nothing at all.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:jzb@zonker.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:30 PM
> To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: cloudstack survey [discuss]
> 
> On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 06:26 AM, Giles Sirett wrote:
> >
> > Joe. I really don't think that we're going to get a decent response if
> > this comes from an individual. It needs to come from a known
> > organisation, who will commit to data protection,etc if we're going to
> > get organisations to respond
> 
> If it's coming on behalf of ACS, I don't see a problem.
> 
> > If we go the route of it officially coming from the community - Who
> > would be able to give clearance to do such a thing ?
> 
> I don't think we need any official clearance from higher up in the ASF to do
> this as a project.
> 
> >
> > I think we *have* to get company name,etc. We need it to know whos
> > responded, to avoid duplicates and also we need to cross match against
> > other,known, users
> 
> I disagree. I'm really not in favor of collecting personal data.
> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> --
> Joe Brockmeier
> jzb@zonker.net
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/



Mime
View raw message