cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: Event approval process changes
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 19:46:31 GMT
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:41:21PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 02:36 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:
> > > Who speaks for the PMC here? Should we have someone on point for this so
> > > we ensure that people get a response in a timely fashion?
> > >
> > 
> > I personally like the board's method of approving new PMC members - at
> > least one director ACKs and given silence you get approved, and I
> > think that works well here. Any PMC member can raise a flag if
> > concerned, but doesn't require a vote or any real process to speak of,
> > aside from time.
> 
> OK. Let's see how that works, and make sure someone is ACK'ing... 

Getting back to my SPOF point, all PMC members on this list should share
that responsibility. ;-)

> 
> > > We should also spell out: Put a [SPONSORSHIP] tag in the subject of the
> > > email, starting a new thread for each event - so we explicitly see an
> > > email for each event in its own thread.
> > >
> > 
> > I don't understand the benefit of this. Who would it benefit? This
> > list isn't a high volume one to begin with, so not like we need to
> > create tons of rules for filtering email.
> 
> Just because this list isn't high volume doesn't mean that the
> recipients aren't receiving a lot of email...

Honestly, I'd say we add it to the doc, but we don't ignore requests that forget it.

> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> -- 
> Joe Brockmeier
> jzb@zonker.net
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
> 

Mime
View raw message