cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <>
Subject Re: Event approval process changes
Date Wed, 22 May 2013 17:35:13 GMT
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:30:43PM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013, at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > The last ASF board meeting dissolved the ConCom PMC, and has split out
> > responsibilities to other parts of the foundation.  This impacts us
> > specifically, in that approvals for the use of our Brand (including
> > events) are primarily the responsibility of the PMC.  
> > 
> > That being said, we are now being asked to switch from concom approval
> > to a trademarks@ lazy consensus.  Guidance from the board was to change
> > our trademark guidelines to require trademarks@ lazy concensus, and that
> > the PMC was actually accountable for all of these approvals.  
> This looks good to me, with one question:
> Who speaks for the PMC here? Should we have someone on point for this so
> we ensure that people get a response in a timely fashion?

I'm not a fan of creating a SPOF for things like this.  I'd suggest that
PMC members on this list all share in the responsibility.  We should all
review and comment.  Perhaps we specify a 72 hour lazy consensus *after*
an ACK from a PMC member.

> We should also spell out: Put a [SPONSORSHIP] tag in the subject of the
> email, starting a new thread for each event - so we explicitly see an
> email for each event in its own thread. 

Good idea.

> Best,
> jzb
> -- 
> Joe Brockmeier
> Twitter: @jzb

View raw message