cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Events Approval
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:46:37 GMT
Requests for approval should be made to the PMC, not the marketing@ list.
The marketing@ list is a convenience tool only. The PMC is the body that
makes the approvals. Or am I misunderstanding something?


On 4 April 2013 15:52, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:45:15AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to request approval for two events that I have been working on,
> according to our trademark policy guidelines:
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Guidelines+(DRAFT)
> >
> > *Citrix would like to donate sponsoring of HPDC:
> > http://hpdc.org/2013/
> > HPDC is an Academic conference on distributed systems, the sponsoring is
> for the best paper awards. The current CloudStack logo is already listed on
> the website and can be replaced by the new one with the proper trademarks
> symbol if needed. The CloudStack community would get a table, with table
> cloth with cloudstack logo, pop-up banner with cloudstack logo, and handout
> tee-shirts with cloudstack logo for free.
> >
> > *Citrix would like to donate silver sponsorship of DevOps Days Amsterdam:
> > http://devopsdays.org/events/2013-amsterdam/
> > CloudStack community would get table/pop-up banner/handout free
> tee-shirts with cloudstack logo
> >
> > I am also working on other events where there is no sponsoring (in the
> sense of paid sponsoring), and I would like to list the one for which I
> received acceptance notification:
> >
> > *I got approval for an Apache CloudStack "project" presence at LinuxTag
> (Berlin May 22-25)
> > http://www.linuxtag.org/2013/
> > CloudStack community would get table/pop-up banner/handout free
> tee-shirts with cloudstack logo
> >
> > At least one Apache CloudStack Committer will be present at these events.
> >
> > -Sebastien
>
> Sebastien,
>
> I'm +1 to these, and I believe we can assume a 72 hour "no objection"
> approach to approval.
>
> When you check with ConCom, let us know how it goes there.  Also, if
> they disagree with being asked about this sort of thing we should change
> our docs... ;-)
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message