cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Sponsoring/Events
Date Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:43:21 GMT
CCing ConCom in case anyone on that list has any feedback.

I know in the past I think I have seen it mentioned that *notification* of
small/medium events would be appreciated on the ConCom (which should really
be Events Committee...) list. But I am not entirely sure.


On 4 April 2013 14:35, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 06:23:06AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am unclear on what the process is for Events where we want to have a
> CloudStack presence. Which type of events requires "approval" ?
> > I browsed the policies but I am still unclear.
> >
> > I see two types of events:
> >
> > -Free events, a community member submits a proposals for a CloudStack
> "booth", it gets accepted.
> > -Paid events, a company sponsors an event and gets a "booth" that it
> wants to donate to CloudStack.
> >
> > I am assuming that meet ups and workshops don't need to get approval.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > -Sebastien
>
> As far as our current draft policy [1] goes, and after reading through
> the sparse guidance I could find on www.a.o [2], here's how I'm
> interpreting it:
>
> - Event sponsorship (I would say that this is typically paid, but
>   sometimes "sponsorship" can be free) requires approval via this list and
>   approval from ConCom (see "Sponsoring Events" at [1]).
>
> - Large events, like CCC12, absolutely require following the rules from
>   [2].
>
> - Exhibiting at an event, if being done by a committer, can be done
>   without requiring approval (see "Exhibiting at Events" at [1]).
>
> - Meetups, small events, etc... don't require approval, but we did
>   document some rules about them (see "Meetup groups..." at [1]).
>
> - Speaking at an event about the project shouldn't require any approvals
>   at all.
>
> And don't forget that any "Non-software goods" produced using the
> project's mark require approval from the PMC via this list.
>
> Anyone have a better / more accurate representation?
>
> -chip
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/csmarks
> [2] http://s.apache.org/4WA
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message