cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kelceydamage@bbits" <kel...@bbits.ca>
Subject Re: Events Approval
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:13:44 GMT
I think events should be discussed on marketing. Dev should remain 'Dev' related.

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 9, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:

> Agreed they should happen publicly. Perhaps it is fine to just do it on dev@,
> but we'd have to make it clear that PMC-level approval is happening on that
> list, and that if you don't subscribe, then you miss out. And hey, perhaps
> we could do that with marketing@ too. i.e. Communicate that if you're on
> the PMC and you want input on events, then you better subscribe. I think
> it's up to us to set the rules. But we should be clear about what we're
> doing, and how people should/can participate.
> 
> 
> On 9 April 2013 22:18, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 03:56 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> But if we are saying that the PMC itself needs to grant approval, then
>>> the PMC as a whole needs to be copied in on the thread. Perhaps that is
>> just
>>> a CC to private@ with any formal request like this. We could then ask
>> that
>>> someone from the PMC acks the request, or we could just allow lazy
>>> consensus to apply, and if nobody objects, then it is approved.
>> 
>> CC'ing private@ seems like a reasonable way to go. I'm with Chip that
>> these requests should happen publicly.
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> jzb
>> --
>> Joe Brockmeier
>> jzb@zonker.net
>> Twitter: @jzb
>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> NS

Mime
View raw message