cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Brockmeier <...@zonker.net>
Subject Re: Events Approval
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:41:07 GMT
On Apr 9, 2013, at 6:13 PM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" <kelcey@bbits.ca> wrote:

> I think events should be discussed on marketing. Dev should remain 'Dev' related.

+1

> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Apr 9, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> 
>> Agreed they should happen publicly. Perhaps it is fine to just do it on dev@,
>> but we'd have to make it clear that PMC-level approval is happening on that
>> list, and that if you don't subscribe, then you miss out. And hey, perhaps
>> we could do that with marketing@ too. i.e. Communicate that if you're on
>> the PMC and you want input on events, then you better subscribe. I think
>> it's up to us to set the rules. But we should be clear about what we're
>> doing, and how people should/can participate.
>> 
>> 
>> On 9 April 2013 22:18, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013, at 03:56 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>>> But if we are saying that the PMC itself needs to grant approval, then
>>>> the PMC as a whole needs to be copied in on the thread. Perhaps that is
>>> just
>>>> a CC to private@ with any formal request like this. We could then ask
>>> that
>>>> someone from the PMC acks the request, or we could just allow lazy
>>>> consensus to apply, and if nobody objects, then it is approved.
>>> 
>>> CC'ing private@ seems like a reasonable way to go. I'm with Chip that
>>> these requests should happen publicly.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> jzb
>>> --
>>> Joe Brockmeier
>>> jzb@zonker.net
>>> Twitter: @jzb
>>> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> NS

Mime
View raw message