cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoff Higginbottom <>
Subject RE: website idea
Date Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:43:43 GMT


Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

-----Original Message-----
From: Kelceydamage@bbits []
Sent: 05 March 2013 17:42
Cc: <>
Subject: Re: website idea

I agree 100%, this is why I pointed out that at my company te ratio of frontent Dev/artists
to back end is 2.2:1. Marketing is a different world then technology development. And it's
generally lead by distinctly seperate visionaries.

We can not approach marketing and website appearance from a developer point of view. The wiki
is for devs/users, the website is for sales(accept without any money) and marketing.

I think researching similar sites is important, and if we get a mock-up I am more then happy
to have my web guys critique it, and provide suggestions.


Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:05 AM, John Kinsella <> wrote:

> First thought: "noooooooooooooooo!" ;)
> Second thought: As ACS is a fairly major project and not a CI engine (sorry, but…),
our website has three purposes:
> a) Get operational folks to want to try ACS
> b) Get developers interested in contributing to ACS
> c) Educate others about why ACS is so #@$@#$ awesome and they (or their teams, or their
companies) should be using it.
> (feel free to expand/contrast on this)
> So, with that said - From my experience, the stereotypical Twitter Bootstrap sites do
not say that to me. They say "this is a site that was quickly set up by a developer so he
could get back to something else." There's not a single graphic element on inria's site -
except for 2 buttons. Not pretty by any means, IMHO. I'm reminded of Ruby projects or Github
projects who think 15 lines in their is AWESOME for their project's website.
> Take a look at the other cloud provisioning project's site. Both looks better and does
a better job of communicating what it is.
> Here's a few sites I've seen recently that I consider "pretty" and "modern" sites:
> - admittedly complicated
> - probably bootstrap based, but at least
> looks good IMHO -
> Just pulled it up while looking through the ASF project list - not bad!
> One thing that we should probably do - look at the websites of other
> players in the space - OnApp, Eucalyptus, VMWare, etc. Our site has to
> play at that level, not a website built for an engineer looking for a
> CI platform (sorry, but…)
> I realize we need a site that's easy to manage and update, but let's see if we can balance
that with something that people remember.
> John
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 5:11 AM, Sebastien Goasguen <>
> wrote:
>> Hi, thinking about website designs, I ran into this one:
>> It's simple, yet modern.
>> I think something along this line with CloudStack logos and some good thinking of
categories would work well.
>> -sebastien
> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service
> o: 415.315.9385
> @johnlkinsella

ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting and implementation services
to help IT Service Providers and Enterprises to build a true IaaS compute cloud. ShapeBlue’s
expertise, combined with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service Providers and Enterprises
to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer or end-user.


This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use
of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those
of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents,
nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received
this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
View raw message