cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hinkle <Mark.Hin...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: website idea
Date Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:12:27 GMT
Would it work if we just called it complimentary technologies and didn't imply an endorsement
as you would with a partner? Just explain the integration and point to the tech, disclaimers
and all.

Mark

On Mar 5, 2013, at 4:00 PM, "Mathias Mullins" <mathias.mullins@citrix.com> wrote:

> David, 
> 
> Then why do we have a "Integration Partners" section of the wiki? We ask
> people to integrate but we don't want to mention that they integrate with
> it? Seems kinda backwards doesn't it? I know a lot of good companies that
> support the Open Source version and are very proud of that fact. Maybe
> it's just a ASF rule.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> On 3/5/13 3:54 PM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> 
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Mathias Mullins
>> <mathias.mullins@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> It will actually flatten out a lot once the content is put in place,
>>> but I
>>> think I'm actually missing a lot of content here.
>>> 
>>> I'm also wondering if there is some of the content like partners and end
>>> users that needs to come off the Wiki and just go to a static page to be
>>> updated as new ones come on. For information that doesn't change often,
>>> I
>>> don't know if it is still a requirement to keep it on the wiki or how
>>> that
>>> works.
>> 
>> 
>> Not to pick nits, but we don't have partners. No one can really
>> partner with Apache CloudStack, we have no real mechanism for doing
>> such things.
>> If they come here to participate (as individuals from places like
>> Caringo, Broadcom, etc have) then they are part of the community (and
>> are individuals, not the company they are employed by)
>> 
>> --David
> 

Mime
View raw message