Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE27200D73 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:38:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7D9B6160C31; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id CA2CC160C10 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:38:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 51525 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2017 07:38:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 51507 invoked by uid 500); 26 Dec 2017 07:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51499 invoked by uid 99); 26 Dec 2017 07:38:06 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20E901A02E2 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VzQQoS0VfQlC for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1A0DC5F1F0 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 95954E04F4 for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 908B5240DE for ; Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9852) Storage Load Balancer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:38:08 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16303608#comment-16303608 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9852: -------------------------------------------- rhtyd commented on issue #2067: CLOUDSTACK-9852: This patch implements the storage lb feature URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2067#issuecomment-353932553 I've fixed the conflicts @anshul-gangwar but your engagement is requested for getting the PR accepted. Additional review requested - @nvazquez @borisstoyanov @DaanHoogland @wido @rafaelweingartner @marcaurele and others @blueorangutan package ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: users@infra.apache.org > Storage Load Balancer > --------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9852 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9852 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: New Feature > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Reporter: Anshul Gangwar > Assignee: Anshul Gangwar > > Currently CloudStack does not support any type of storage load balancing. It always lists the primary storage and secondary storage in same order and the pick the first one which satisfies the criteria. If user wants to load balance then there is no way for user to tell volume to go to different primary storage or secondary storage. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)