cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9782) Host HA
Date Mon, 10 Apr 2017 06:39:41 GMT


ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782:

Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
    @koushik-das I see that main issue is that this is being confused as VM HA framework.
Will like to again add that this framework is not for VM-HA but for host HA. With this implementation
of OOBM framework, Cloudstack is now in the position to control and HA a host. These developments
helped us in putting together a Host HA framework. Only that while designing and coding we
tried to keep it flexible so that later other entities that can be HAed can be added to the

> Host HA
> -------
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782
>                 URL:
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Rohit Yadav
>            Assignee: Rohit Yadav
>             Fix For: Future,
> CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha feature is to
provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation specific for hypervisor that can
use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi based power management) to reliably investigate,
recover and fencing a host. This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash
issues and reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM.
> FS:

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message