Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61377200C5B for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:14:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 5FC8B160B89; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 806CE160B7E for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:14:47 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 20767 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2017 19:14:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 20758 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2017 19:14:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 20755 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2017 19:14:45 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:45 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1E432C11B6 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:45 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.652 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.652 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l_KdZ3H2zfEi for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 6F4E75FAF1 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 80257E0AE8 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D8B5C243BE for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9827) Storage tags stored in multiple places MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:14:48 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9827?page=3Dcom.atla= ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId= =3D15924827#comment-15924827 ]=20 ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9827: -------------------------------------------- Github user nvazquez commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1994#discussion_r106002237 =20 --- Diff: engine/schema/test/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/db= /PrimaryDataStoreDaoImplTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one +// or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file +// distributed with this work for additional information +// regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file +// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the +// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance +// with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at +// +// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 +// +// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, +// software distributed under the License is distributed on an +// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY +// KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the +// specific language governing permissions and limitations +// under the License. +package org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.db; + +import static org.mockito.Mockito.doReturn; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.verify; + +import java.util.Arrays; +import java.util.HashMap; +import java.util.List; +import java.util.Map; + +import org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.db.PrimaryDataStoreDaoI= mpl.ValueType; +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import org.junit.runner.RunWith; +import org.mockito.InjectMocks; +import org.mockito.Matchers; +import org.mockito.Mock; +import org.mockito.Spy; +import org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner; + +import com.cloud.storage.ScopeType; +import com.cloud.storage.dao.StoragePoolHostDao; +import com.cloud.storage.dao.StoragePoolTagsDao; + +import junit.framework.TestCase; + +@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class) +public class PrimaryDataStoreDaoImplTest extends TestCase { + + @Mock + StoragePoolDetailsDao _detailsDao; + @Mock + StoragePoolHostDao _hostDao; + @Mock + StoragePoolTagsDao _tagsDao; + + @Spy + @InjectMocks + private static PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl primaryDataStoreDao =3D new= PrimaryDataStoreDaoImpl(); + + @Mock + static StoragePoolVO storagePoolVO; --- End diff -- =20 Thanks! I removed it > Storage tags stored in multiple places > -------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9827 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-982= 7 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the defa= ult.)=20 > Components: Management Server > Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Environment: N/A > Reporter: Mike Tutkowski > Assignee: Nicolas Vazquez > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 4.10.0.0 > > > I marked this as a Blocker because it concerns me that we are not handlin= g storage tags correctly in 4.10 and, as such, VM storage might get placed = in locations that users don't want. > From e-mails I sent to dev@ (most recent to oldest): > If I add a new primary storage and give it a storage tag, the tag ends up= in storage_pool_details. > If I edit an existing storage pool=E2=80=99s storage tags, it places them= in storage_pool_tags. > ********** > I believe I have found another bug (one that we should either fix or exam= ine in detail before releasing 4.10). > It looks like we have a new table: cloud.storage_pool_tags. > The addition of this table seems to have broken the listStorageTags API c= ommand. When this command runs, it doesn=E2=80=99t pick up any storage tags= for me (and I know I have one storage tag). > This data used to be stored in the cloud.storage_pool_details table. It= =E2=80=99s good to put it in its own table, but will our upgrade process mo= ve the existing tags from storage_pool_details to storage_pool_tags? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)