Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA11200C47 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:06:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id AB1EE160B9A; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 05676160B78 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 19045 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2017 12:06:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19028 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2017 12:06:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19021 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2017 12:06:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9B3F0CD39F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.202 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hJ8rdaOLrP7z for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 654725FC64 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id EFC00E0A6C for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id A847F21DD9 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9808) 4.9->4.10 upgrade does not upgrade global settings to point to new template MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:06:45 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9808?page=3Dcom.atla= ssian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId= =3D15948937#comment-15948937 ]=20 ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9808: -------------------------------------------- Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2023 =20 LGTM @kishankavala did you check what went wrong with the kvm template. @kar= uturi reported that and it was probably some auto-conflict-resolution. > 4.9->4.10 upgrade does not upgrade global settings to point to new templa= te > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9808 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-980= 8 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the defa= ult.)=20 > Components: Upgrade > Affects Versions: 4.10.0.0 > Reporter: Boris Stoyanov > Assignee: Kishan Kavala > Priority: Blocker > > Following the same source of information (http://docs.cloudstack.apache.o= rg/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.10/upgrade/upgrade-4.9.html) > I=E2=80=99ve registered the template with the right naming: "systemvm-kvm= -4.10=E2=80=9D, waited until it was in Ready status. > Then upgraded management and the cloudstack-agent on all hosts.=20 > Upon starting the management, the DB upgrade was successful. I=E2=80=99ve= logged in the system and observed that it was still using 4.6.0 ssvm templ= ates. The option to upgrade the VR wasn=E2=80=99t available as well. Checki= ng global settings it turns out minreq.sysvmtemplate.version =3D 4.6.0 and = router.template.kvm was pointing to the original ssmv template (not systemv= m-kvm-4.10). The original ssvm template is still in active state but it sho= uld be in InActive.=20 > This basically leaves the user unable to upgrade ssvm (which are not work= ing btw) without hacking the DB and global settings=20 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)