cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9408) remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com
Date Fri, 17 Mar 2017 15:04:41 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930091#comment-15930091
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9408:
--------------------------------------------

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#discussion_r106670299
  
    --- Diff: api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/AutoScaleVmProfileResponse.java ---
    @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
         @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.CS_URL,
                    type = CommandType.STRING,
                    description = "the API URL including port of the CloudStack Management
Server example: http://server.cloud.com:8080/client/api?")
    +    // leaving cloud.com reference above as it serves only as an example
    --- End diff --
    
    I agree that it is out of the scope. I just wanted to ask about the idea of starting using
notations instead of real URLs as examples.
    
    To tell you the truth I have already seen so many time people not thinking while seeing
examples like this and using a copy/paste working mode that I try to avoid it sometimes, just
to force people to change the parameters.
    
    It is nothing that you need to change, I just so it, and I wanted to check your opinion
;)


> remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9408
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9408
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>    Affects Versions: 4.5.2, 4.6.2, 4.7.1, 4.8.0, 4.9.0
>            Reporter: Daan Hoogland
>            Assignee: Daan Hoogland
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> As cloud.com was bought and sold, We have no assurance and can give none to our users
as to wether downloads from that site will remain possible. This is to investigate what occurances
of cloud.com can remain and which need to change, and change them.
> [~chiradeep][~widodh] I am assigning this to me but am going to ask for some further
assistance.
> [~wstevens]I got no pushback so I am marking this as blocker for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Mime
View raw message