cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8239) Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
Date Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:03:33 GMT


ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8239:

Github user nathanejohnson commented on the issue:
    Also, I just made a commit, I have not squashed it because I wanted to get some feedback.
 I noticed that vmware uses details to pass rootDiskController for the bus type, and there
was even some code that inspected this in the kvm plugin.  With this latest commit, it will
actually honor either OS type "Other PV Virtio-SCSI" or rootDiskController passed in via details,
with details overriding OS type.  I also made a minor tweak to the UI to allow setting the
root disk bus via the add template dialog in the UI:
    So this way you can select virtio scsi by one of the following three ways:
    1) selecting os type as "Other PV Virtio-SCSI (64 bit)"
    2) uploading a template and specifying details[0].rootDiskController=scsi, either from
the UI or the API, then creating a VM from this template
    3) deploying a VM and specifying details[0].rootDiskController=scsi , currently only available
via the API

> Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
> -----------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239
>                 URL:
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: KVM, Storage Controller
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.0
>         Environment: KVM
>            Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky
>            Assignee: Wido den Hollander
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: ceph, gsoc2017, kvm, libvirt, rbd, storage_drivers, virtio
>             Fix For: Future
> It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors.
> The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing the number
of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and reclaim unused blocks from
the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also talks about having a greater performance
advantage as well.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message