Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0504200C24 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:15:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9ED97160B64; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E18F4160B50 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 11:15:48 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 55961 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2017 10:15:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 55952 invoked by uid 500); 23 Feb 2017 10:15:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 55949 invoked by uid 99); 23 Feb 2017 10:15:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A8B5718E16A for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.199 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Szl12atUWh9t for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id BA57F5FE3F for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B5B94E08F5 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8FC1724140 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9782) Host HA MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:15:49 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880222#comment-15880222 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782: -------------------------------------------- Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960 @rhtyd tests looks good, except this one: ``` ERROR: Tests default ha providers list ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/marvin/tests/smoke/test_hostha_simulator.py", line 199, in test_ha_list_providers response = self.apiclient.listHostHAProviders(cmd)[0] TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__' ``` Looks like when simulator is not deployed test would fail. > Host HA > ------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: New Feature > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Reporter: Rohit Yadav > Assignee: Rohit Yadav > Fix For: Future, 4.11.0.0 > > > CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha feature is to provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation specific for hypervisor that can use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi based power management) to reliably investigate, recover and fencing a host. This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash issues and reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM. > FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)