Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B7D200C14 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:01:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0448A160B32; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C72C160B68 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 23:01:57 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 19227 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2017 22:01:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19217 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2017 22:01:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 19214 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2017 22:01:56 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:01:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 987351A086B for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87QlciAAsKUr for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9969B5F1E9 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 07033E03A1 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id ACF602528B for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 22:01:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9574) Redesign storage views MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 22:01:58 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15856885#comment-15856885 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9574: -------------------------------------------- Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1747 @nvazquez, @serg38, before checking code any deeper a have a more high-level question. This PR will change the response of an API method, right? It will remove some data that today is being delivered to users. If I understood it properly, this data (storage tags) will be delivered/retrieved using another method. This may break compatibility with current clients that may use this information. If so, this break in compatibility has to be properly documented. Do you guys know how we could do this? Is there a protocol for this? Some alert on the release notes? Or maybe something on documentation pages? > Redesign storage views > ---------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9574 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9574 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Components: API, UI > Reporter: Nicolas Vazquez > Assignee: Nicolas Vazquez > Attachments: PS-DETAILS.PNG, PS.PNG > > > h2. Part 1: Redesign storage tags > h3. Actual behavior > Primary storage tags are being saved as an entry on {{storage_pool_details}} with: > * name = TAG_NAME > * value = "true" > When a boolean property is defined in {{storage_pool_details}} and has value = "true", it is displayed as a tag. > !https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12836196/PS-DETAILS.PNG! > !https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12836195/PS.PNG! > h3. Goal > Redesign {{Storage Tags}} for Primary Storage view, to list only tags, as it is done in Host Tags (Hosts view). > h2. Part 2: Remove details from listImageStores API call response and UI > h3. Description > In Secondary Storage view we propose removing Details field, as Setting tab list details for a given image store. We also remove details from response on listImageStores API method -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)