Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3103200C26 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:38:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B1A91160B5D; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 046C6160B5B for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 16:38:52 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 4506 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2017 15:38:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 4497 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2017 15:38:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 4494 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2017 15:38:52 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id AE62DC0C33 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.451 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EszIeGHNA3ZB for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B4AE360DE1 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 1570DE012B for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0B9902412B for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:44 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9114) restartnetwork with cleanup should not update/restart both routers at once MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Sat, 25 Feb 2017 15:38:53 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15884281#comment-15884281 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9114: -------------------------------------------- Github user remibergsma commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1198 @ustcweizhou If you find some time to submit PRs for restartVPC+cleanup which does the router rebuild in sequence that would be awesome. Happy to help testing! Thanks! > restartnetwork with cleanup should not update/restart both routers at once > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9114 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9114 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Reporter: Wei Zhou > Assignee: Wei Zhou > > for now, restartnetwork with cleanup will stop both RVRs at first, then start two new RVRs. > to reduce the downtime of network, we'd better restart the RVRs one by one. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)