Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3734A200C15 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:25:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 35CE4160B4E; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E47F160B5A for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:25:24 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 80894 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2017 09:24:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 80752 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2017 09:24:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80740 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2017 09:24:12 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:24:12 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 27587C0C0B for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:24:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hyi8gtO2XUQt for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3784A61EFA for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:24:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A9FEDE0D2A for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id D6F2425293 for ; Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 09:23:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Daan Hoogland (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-3536) Retrofit Swift Python Client with a Java-based client MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:25:25 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Daan Hoogland closed CLOUDSTACK-3536. ------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix > Retrofit Swift Python Client with a Java-based client > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-3536 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3536 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Components: Storage Controller > Affects Versions: 4.2.0 > Reporter: John Burwell > > Currently, we use the Swift Python client invoked via shell script to interact with Swift stores. While functional, it prevents the management server from managing connection pools, exploiting rich exception handling, and Java I/O streams. Switching to a native Java client (e.g. https://github.com/woorea/openstack-java-sdk) would allow CloudStack to utilize these features. Since no Java client available supports progress reporting or > 5 GB storage, we would likely need to contribute these enhancements before performing a retrofit. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)