cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9782) Host HA
Date Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:49:45 GMT


ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782:

Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
    @abhinandanprateek If you refer to the discussion on dev@, @rhtyd
proposed it as a generic HA framework for any resources (and not limited to VM). Now if it
just a replacement of the existing VM-HA framework then we need to discuss the benefits it
provides in more detail compared to the existing one. I have already made some specific comments
on the justifications provided in favour of a new framework.

> Host HA
> -------
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782
>                 URL:
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Rohit Yadav
>            Assignee: Rohit Yadav
>             Fix For: Future,
> CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha feature is to
provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation specific for hypervisor that can
use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi based power management) to reliably investigate,
recover and fencing a host. This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash
issues and reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM.
> FS:

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message