cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daan Hoogland (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-964) fix python module naming
Date Wed, 08 Feb 2017 09:24:00 GMT


Daan Hoogland closed CLOUDSTACK-964.
    Resolution: Won't Fix

> fix python module naming
> ------------------------
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-964
>                 URL:
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Noa Resare
>            Priority: Minor
> There are two toplevel python modules that is part of cloudstack, named 'coud_utils'
and 'cloudutils' respectively. This seems very much like an artifact of the development of
the project rather than actual design. 
> I propose we make things a bit more straightforward by putting all modules into a single
namespace with a name easily derived from the project name, such as 'cloudstack', and update
import statements accordingly.
> So, is this an incompatible change to a published API or not? I would claim it is not,
and the fact that the python modules gets installed into the system python path by default
is just a side effect of people doing packaging not being up to date on how private python
packaging is normally done in Debian.

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message