Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB16200BEB for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:32:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 89387160B2E; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:32:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A269160B19 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 12:31:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 62522 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 62504 invoked by uid 500); 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 62497 invoked by uid 99); 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533762C022B for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:31:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "DeepthiMachiraju (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-9712) Establishing Remote access VPN is failing due to mismatch of preshared secrets. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:32:00 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] DeepthiMachiraju updated CLOUDSTACK-9712: ----------------------------------------- Description: - On a Isolated Network enable VPN , and configure few VPN users. - Deploy a windows 2012R2 VM in the shared network . Create a new VPN connection by providing the NAt ip , select L2tp in the confguration and provide the psk provided by cloudstack. - Try logging with the vpn users created above. Observations : - User fails to login with the following error message at client : " Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer ". - Each time VPN is DIsabled/Enabled , new key is stored in ipsec.any.secrets. root@r-5-VM:~# cat /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.any.secrets : PSK "O3rEXqxgMXRvNkPRXaqtkg43" : PSK "ZwEcGeHKnE9z2zpPht9eh77T" : PSK "7CUjMgwO8sbMJXjyHhRg2NDp" Note : when the older psk are deleted and only the current key is retained in the file , remote vpn is established sucessfully. =============================================auth.log============================================== Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000009] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 10.147.52.62 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no NAT detected Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 ================================================================================================= was: - On a Isolated Network enable VPN , and configure few VPN users. - Deploy a windows 2012R2 VM in the shared network . Create a new VPN connection by providing the NAt ip , select L2tp in the confguration and provide the psk provided by cloudstack. - Try logging with the vpn users created above. Observations : - User fails to login with the following error message at client : " Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer ". - Each time VPN is DIsabled/Enabled , new key is stored in ipsec.any.secrets. root@r-5-VM:~# cat /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.any.secrets : PSK "O3rEXqxgMXRvNkPRXaqtkg43" : PSK "ZwEcGeHKnE9z2zpPht9eh77T" : PSK "7CUjMgwO8sbMJXjyHhRg2NDp" =============================================auth.log============================================== Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000009] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1] Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 10.147.52.62 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no NAT detected Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 ================================================================================================= > Establishing Remote access VPN is failing due to mismatch of preshared secrets. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9712 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9712 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Components: Virtual Router > Affects Versions: 4.9.0 > Reporter: DeepthiMachiraju > Priority: Critical > Attachments: management-server.rar > > > - On a Isolated Network enable VPN , and configure few VPN users. > - Deploy a windows 2012R2 VM in the shared network . Create a new VPN connection by providing the NAt ip , select L2tp in the confguration and provide the psk provided by cloudstack. > - Try logging with the vpn users created above. > Observations : > - User fails to login with the following error message at client : " Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer ". > - Each time VPN is DIsabled/Enabled , new key is stored in ipsec.any.secrets. > root@r-5-VM:~# cat /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.any.secrets > : PSK "O3rEXqxgMXRvNkPRXaqtkg43" > : PSK "ZwEcGeHKnE9z2zpPht9eh77T" > : PSK "7CUjMgwO8sbMJXjyHhRg2NDp" > Note : when the older psk are deleted and only the current key is retained in the file , remote vpn is established sucessfully. > =============================================auth.log============================================== > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000009] > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION] > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable] > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact] > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1] > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 10.147.52.62 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no NAT detected > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 > Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 > Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 > Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 > Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255 > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48 > Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500 > ================================================================================================= -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)