Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E431188A0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23222 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 23168 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 23144 invoked by uid 500); 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23111 invoked by uid 99); 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 +0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826352C1F60 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 12:25:25 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9319) Timeout is not passed to virtual router operations consistently MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15208329#comment-15208329 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9319: -------------------------------------------- GitHub user insom opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451 CLOUDSTACK-9319: Use timeout when applying config to virtual router From the [JIRA issue](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9319): > The timeout parameter is not passed down to `applyConfigToVR` inside `VirtualRoutingResource` in all cases. > > This timeout is worked out as 3 seconds per command or 120 seconds (whichever is larger), but because it's not passed to the first invocation, the default (120 seconds, DEFAULT_EXECUTEINVR_TIMEOUT) is used. > > In a recent upgrade of our Virtual Routers, the timeout was being hit and increasing `router.aggregation.command.each.timeout` had no effect. I built a custom 4.8 agent with the timeout increased to allow the upgrade to continue. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/insom/cloudstack CLOUDSTACK-9319 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1451.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1451 ---- commit 9f353b4672c0f875b7f64b4d1fadd458ff9abad3 Author: Aaron Brady Date: 2016-03-23T12:15:24Z Use timeout when applying config to virtual router ---- > Timeout is not passed to virtual router operations consistently > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-9319 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9319 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Components: Virtual Router > Affects Versions: 4.8.0 > Environment: KVM + Ceph cloud, Ubuntu hosts. > Reporter: Aaron Brady > Priority: Trivial > > The timeout parameter is not passed down to `applyConfigToVR` inside `VirtualRoutingResource` in all cases. > This timeout is worked out as 3 seconds per command or 120 seconds (whichever is larger), but because it's not passed to the first invocation, the default (120 seconds, DEFAULT_EXECUTEINVR_TIMEOUT) is used. > In a recent upgrade of our Virtual Routers, the timeout was being hit and increasing `router.aggregation.command.each.timeout` had no effect. I built a custom 4.8 agent with the timeout increased to allow the upgrade to continue. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)