Return-Path: 
 <issues-return-65778-apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive=cloudstack.apache.org@cloudstack.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB8D618FDC
	for <apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 43214 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43150 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 -0000
Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:issues-unsubscribe@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:issues@cloudstack.apache.org>
List-Id: <issues.cloudstack.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43064 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 43053 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 -0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas) (140.211.11.28)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:19:11 +0000
Received: from arcas.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by arcas (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8047B2C14F6
	for <cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org>;
 Mon,  7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 20:19:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org
Message-ID: <JIRA.12918912.1449215923000.293444.1449519551522@Atlassian.JIRA>
In-Reply-To: <JIRA.12918912.1449215923000@Atlassian.JIRA>
References: <JIRA.12918912.1449215923000@Atlassian.JIRA>
 <JIRA.12918912.1449215923429@arcas>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9106) As a Developer I want the
 Redundant VPC private gateway feature fixed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394


    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9106?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15045627#comment-15045627 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9106:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 13eb78938820489efc0251cf85ed4e7fd01f685d in cloudstack's branch refs/heads/4.6 from [~wilder.rodrigues]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=13eb789 ]

CLOUDSTACK-9106 - Makes the router commands call more consistent.

   - Checks the result of a call against the previous result. Either both are true or the method returns false.
   - Do not thrown exceptions because some calls are not handling/rethrowing them. It would cause runtime problems.
   - When doing a list.addAll(Arrays.asList(String[]{}) will cause problems when trying to cast the list.toArray() into an aray of String
     It would only work if instead of calling addAll() I would pass it straight into the constructor:
     e.g. List<String> l = new ArrayList(Arrays.asList(new String[]{});
          Stirng [] s = (String[]) l.toArray();
     But I did not like that implementation because it would require 2 arrays of string and combine them at the end.


> As a Developer I want the Redundant VPC private gateway feature fixed
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9106
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9106
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Virtual Router
>    Affects Versions: 4.6.0
>            Reporter: Wilder Rodrigues
>            Assignee: Wilder Rodrigues
>             Fix For: 4.7.0
>
>
> Bug in BasicNetworkTopology.applyRules() method.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)