cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-9158) Remove SLF4J
Date Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:28:46 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9158?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15055622#comment-15055622
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9158:
--------------------------------------------

Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1236#issuecomment-164376707
  
    @borisroman slf4j sits in a layer above log4j. I?m not sure about the particular case
you are dealing with, however if we were using slf4j with log4j consistently it would be much
easier to now move to logback (the successor of log4j). In thta case the code would be depending
on the slf4j classes, and the implementation would be configurable (i.g. log4j, logback, other
logging libs).


> Remove SLF4J
> ------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9158
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9158
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Boris Schrijver
>            Assignee: Boris Schrijver
>
> We're using log4j everywhere in the project. Therefore SLF4J is abundant.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message