cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6276) Affinity Groups within projects
Date Mon, 30 Nov 2015 06:38:10 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15031391#comment-15031391
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-6276:
--------------------------------------------

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1134#issuecomment-160532869
  
    Yes, I understand and it makes sense to have that documented. It doesn't have to mean
we phase out QueryService. This makes sense to be there for people with read-only access and
it can be used by other services. It also makes sense to consider if Example is a final type
of resource or a generic (or implementation of a generic type of resource). A service would
be for the whole family, would it?
    
    btw @pdube none of my remarks should be interpreted as a -1 to your PR! I like big very
much this ;)


> Affinity Groups within projects
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6276
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6276
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>            Reporter: Ingo Jochim
>
> Hello,
> I like to have the features "Affinity Group" and "Project" combined.
> As far as I know I cannot use Affinity Groups within Projects.
> Thanks and regards,
> Ingo



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message