cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-8749) KVM: link local route cleanup
Date Wed, 19 Aug 2015 10:14:45 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14702809#comment-14702809
] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8749:
--------------------------------------------

GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/718

    CLOUDSTACK-8749: KVM - cleanup linklocal interface based on names

    This tries to avoid cleaning by a device name.

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack kvm-linklocal-cleanup

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/718.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #718
    
----
commit ee5638e460c3a6437d5f26764b4c6ec4226652c5
Author: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
Date:   2015-08-19T10:08:31Z

    CLOUDSTACK-8749: KVM - cleanup linklocal interface based on names
    
    This tries to avoid cleaning by a device name.
    
    Signed-off-by: Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>

----


> KVM: link local route cleanup
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-8749
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8749
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Rohit Yadav
>            Assignee: Rohit Yadav
>
> The KVM agent attempts to delete link local interfaces whenever found, so they don't conflict with the system vm's link local route on cloud0, however it doesn't specify which device to delete the route for.
> The aim is to fix the edge case which (unlikely) can try to delete existing cloud0 routes/interface.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message