cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ronald van Zantvoort (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-7874) "CPU (in MHz)" does not make sense
Date Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:06:34 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14206359#comment-14206359
] 

Ronald van Zantvoort commented on CLOUDSTACK-7874:
--------------------------------------------------

I agree that it's confusing at best, especially considering that it's a relative priority;
in KVM it uses <cputune><shares> which says it all. 

'weight', 'share','relative priority', it's all better than 'Mhz' :)




> "CPU (in MHz)" does not make sense
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-7874
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7874
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Hypervisor Controller, UI
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.1
>         Environment: CentOS 6 x86_64 mgmt + HVs
>            Reporter: Nux
>              Labels: UI, cpu, cpuspeed
>
> Hello,
> This "CPU (in MHz)" description when adding a new Service Offering does not make much
sense and is misleading. 
> As far as I know this is the "cpu weight" Xen feature to determine CPU access/time priority;
it should be presented as such or it should be determined automatically based on Core count.
> In my particular setup I have edited classes/resources/messages.properties and modified
it as follows:
> label.cpu.mhz=CPU priority (same number as cores)
> Is this something that could be changed?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Mime
View raw message