Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6F9311FBF for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65097 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-issues-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 65065 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 65018 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64940 invoked by uid 99); 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 -0000 Received: from arcas.apache.org (HELO arcas.apache.org) (140.211.11.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 +0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Saksham Srivastava (JIRA)" To: cloudstack-issues@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6812) For storage type which does not support over provisioning ,over provisioning factor shold be 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14027416#comment-14027416 ] Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-6812: ------------------------------------------------ I agree with the non modifiable part. I don't think we should be having a different default for non supported types. This is not consistent. All pools should have a similar default value. In future if we start supporting other types, there should be a consistency across pools. > For storage type which does not support over provisioning ,over provisioning factor shold be 1 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CLOUDSTACK-6812 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6812 > Project: CloudStack > Issue Type: Bug > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) > Components: Management Server > Affects Versions: 4.4.0 > Reporter: prashant kumar mishra > Assignee: Saksham Srivastava > Fix For: 4.4.0 > > > currently over provisioning is supported for only nfs and vmfs ,for storage type like lvm, iscsi over provisioning is not supported ,default value of over provisioning factor should be 1 . and it should be non modifiable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252)