cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Saksham Srivastava (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6812) For storage type which does not support over provisioning ,over provisioning factor shold be 1
Date Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:03:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6812?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14027416#comment-14027416
] 

Saksham Srivastava commented on CLOUDSTACK-6812:
------------------------------------------------

I agree with the non modifiable part.
I don't think we should be having a different default for non supported types. This is not
consistent.
All pools should have a similar default value. 
In future if we start supporting other types, there should be a consistency across pools.

> For storage type which does not support over provisioning ,over provisioning factor shold
be 1 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6812
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6812
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>            Reporter: prashant kumar mishra
>            Assignee: Saksham Srivastava
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> currently over provisioning is supported for only nfs and vmfs ,for storage type like
lvm, iscsi  over provisioning is not supported ,default value of over provisioning factor
should be 1 . and it should be non modifiable. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message