cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Daan Hoogland (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-6320) Upgrade 4.1.1 -> 4.3.0 OVS provider should be inserted to the physical network
Date Fri, 16 May 2014 11:19:43 GMT

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]

Daan Hoogland updated CLOUDSTACK-6320:
--------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: 4.3.1)
                   4.4.0

> Upgrade 4.1.1 -> 4.3.0 OVS provider should be inserted to the physical network
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6320
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6320
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>    Affects Versions: 4.3.0
>         Environment: Upgrading from CS 4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0, using Xenserver 6.1.0
> Advanced zone with GRE isolation is configured before upgrade. 
>            Reporter: Florin Dumitrascu
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will 
> automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
> However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3, 
> server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
> Full message thread:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 4:18 PM
> To: Jessica Wang; Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
> Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - Is your zone an
Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
> Then its a DB upgrade bug. If the GRE isolation is supported on the network in 4.1.1,
DB upgrade should have inserted the provider to physical network.
> On 3/21/14, 3:51 PM, "Jessica Wang" <Jessica.Wang@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> [Alena] Not exactly like that.
> >> [Alena] None of the providers are added to the physical network by 
> >>default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API.
> >> [Alena] Our CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network 
> >>- for you by calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
> >
> >Actually, OVS provider is an exception.
> >UI doesn't do the job because server-side already does the job.
> >When you create an Advanced zone in 4.3 code, server-side will 
> >automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
> >However, since your zone was created in 4.1 code and upgraded to 4.3, 
> >server-side won't automatically add OVS provider to its physical network.
> >
> >Murali, please confirm.
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Alena Prokharchyk
> >Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:44 PM
> >To: Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang; Murali Reddy; Florin Dumitrascu
> >Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - 
> >Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
> >
> >
> >
> >On 3/21/14, 2:34 PM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
> ><florin.dumitrascu@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Alena, my assumption is that the Ovs provider is created when you 
> >>create the physical network with GRE isolation (if someone can confirm ...).
> >>When I configured CS RC8 from scratch, I could see the provider and 
> >>enable it in the GUI.
> >
> >Not exactly like that. None of the providers are added to the physical 
> >network by default if execute createPhysicalNetwork call via API. Our 
> >CS UI does this job - adding the providers to the network - for you by 
> >calling addNetworkServiceProvider call.
> >
> >
> >
> >>But when I have upgraded from CS 4.1.1 to 4.3.0 RC9, I have preserved 
> >>the existing configuration with the existing physical network.
> >>So my assumption is that the physical network was not updated with the 
> >>OVS provider (such a provider was not needed in CS 4.1.1).
> >
> >So while you were on 4.1.1, GRE isolation was disabled? Did you enable 
> >it on 4.3? If there is a way to enable new isolation on the physical 
> >network, on my opinion - the UI should perform the background call and 
> >add all the providers associated with this option, to the physical 
> >network. So it would be a UI issue.
> >
> >Or the case was the following - the GRE isolation was enabled on your 
> >network while on 4.1.1, but new provider - OVS - was added in 4.3. And 
> >this provider wasn't added to existing physical networks during the 
> >upgrade. Then its a database upgrade bug.
> >
> >
> >Please confirm which one from the above is correct.
> >
> >>
> >>Jessica, I am building CentOS RPM packages from the RC source, using 
> >>"package.sh" script in the source packaging folder. Not aware about 
> >>the difference between "oss" and "noredist".
> >>Also, my setup is for an advanced zone.
> >>
> >>Kind Regards,
> >>Florin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Jessica Wang [mailto:Jessica.Wang@citrix.com]
> >>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 8:28 PM
> >>To: Florin Dumitrascu; Murali Reddy
> >>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Alena 
> >>Prokharchyk
> >>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - 
> >>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone? (2)
> >>
> >>Florin,
> >>UI doesn't show OVS service provider because database doesn't have OVS 
> >>service provider.
> >>The reasons might be:
> >>(1) You are using oss build (should be using noredist build).
> >>(2) Your zone is a Basic zone (OVS service provider is only supported 
> >>in Advanced zone)
> >>
> >>
> >>Murali,
> >>Is there other possibility?
> >>
> >>
> >>Jessica
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Jessica Wang
> >>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 1:15 PM
> >>To: Alena Prokharchyk; Florin Dumitrascu
> >>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy; 
> >>dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>Subject: RE: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0) - 
> >>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
> >>
> >>Florin,
> >>
> >>Is your zone an Advanced zone or Basic zone?
> >>
> >>Jessica
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Alena Prokharchyk
> >>Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 11:53 AM
> >>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Florin Dumitrascu; Jessica Wang
> >>Cc: Nguyen Anh Tu (tuna@apache.org); Murali Reddy
> >>Subject: Re: GRE isolation - no in service upgrade (4.1.1 to 4.3.0)
> >>
> >>Florin, you have to add the provider to the physical network first, 
> >>and then enable it. To add a provider to physical network, use 
> >>addNetworkServiceProvider. To enable it after, use 
> >>updateNetworkServiceProvider . Not sure why our UI doesn┬╣t have this 
> >>functionality enabled. Jessica, can you check out if the UI supports 
> >>adding physical network providers, and under what conditions?
> >>
> >>Thanks,
> >>Alena.
> >>
> >>
> >>On 3/21/14, 11:47 AM, "Florin Dumitrascu"
> >><florin.dumitrascu@intunenetworks.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I have successfully tested GRE isolation with CS 4.3.0 RC8 installed 
> >>>from scratch on a minimal setup.
> >>>
> >>>I have moved then on to upgrading a more complex lab setup from CS 
> >>>4.1.1 to CS 4.3.0 RC9.
> >>>I have followed the guidelines here for doing the upgrade:
> >>>http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.
> >>>h
> >>>t
> >>>ml#upgrade-from-4-1-x-to-4-3
> >>>
> >>>Once CS was back up and running, I have created an OVS network 
> >>>offering using the GUI fix up from
> >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6162
> >>>
> >>>I tried then to enable the OVS service provider on the physical 
> >>>network, but discovered that no such provider is created.
> >>>None in the GUI:
> >>>http://imgur.com/ar8c7sX
> >>>
> >>>And none in the database:
> >>>http://imgur.com/MsIdYrw
> >>>
> >>>So this means I pretty much need to re-configure the whole zone from 
> >>>scratch, since I do not know of another way to change the physical 
> >>>networks.
> >>>
> >>>If GRE is to be used in the production, this is a major drawback.
> >>>
> >>>Any thoughts ?
> >>>
> >>>Best Regards,
> >>>Florin



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Mime
View raw message