cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John Kinsella (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-6166) Should we be recommending ASYNC NFS in documentation?
Date Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:13:20 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13910675#comment-13910675
] 

John Kinsella commented on CLOUDSTACK-6166:
-------------------------------------------

Would be helpful if you could add some example logs...

> Should we be recommending ASYNC NFS in documentation?
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6166
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6166
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: Doc
>            Reporter: John Kinsella
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Looking at current and past installation, we recommend users export secondary storage
with async NFS:
> /export  *(rw,async,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)
> Generally async mode is considered risky from a data reliability point of view (eg http://serverfault.com/questions/328931/how-dangerous-is-nfs-async-when-raid-bbu-and-ups-are-present
).
> While advanced users will see this and ignore it, we probably shouldn't be guiding new
ACS users towards async NFS...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Mime
View raw message