cloudstack-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-3468) Failed to Deploy Instances with multiple VMWARE clusters when DVS is enabled at the Zone level
Date Mon, 29 Jul 2013 03:09:47 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13722130#comment-13722130
] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-3468:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 7ba5d9910b3a97ef16f7f3925057d9cbfcc616f3 in branch refs/heads/4.2 from [~sateeshc]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=7ba5d99 ]

CLOUDSTACK-3468 Failed to Deploy Instances with multiple VMWARE clusters when DVS is enabled
at the Zone level

Fixing cluster level override of zone level specified vSwitch settings.

Signed-off-by: Sateesh Chodapuneedi <sateesh@apache.org>

                
> Failed to Deploy Instances with multiple VMWARE clusters when DVS is enabled at the Zone
level
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3468
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: VMware
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0
>            Reporter: Sailaja Mada
>            Assignee: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: apilog.log.2013-07-09.gz, management-server.log.2013-07-09
>
>
> Setup : 
> Two VMWARE clusters :  Cluster1 is with DVS , Cluster2 is with Standard switch
> 1. Enable vmware.use.dvswitch to true
> 2. Configure Zone with with 
>  a)Physical network 1 with Mgmt traffic  - With Label as vSwitch0
>  b)Physical network 2 with guest & public traffic   - Label as newdv1,,vmwaredvs

> 3.  Add Cluster 1 during Zone deployment without overriding Public/Guest traffic as the
labels are configured at the zone level
> 4. Create new account and deploy VM's on DVS Enabled cluster
> 5. Add second cluster with Standard switch specifying the traffic label as vSwitch0 with
override option selected with Standard switch.
> 6. Update host tag to the host added under this cluster
> 7. Tried to deploy new VM under this cluster - I already have one instance and Router
with Account 1 with this guestnetwork created with DVS cluster. Now I am trying to create
one more instance on standard switch cluster using host TAGS.
> Observation: 
> Failed to create Guest port groups while deploying instances with Mixed VMWARE clusters
of different switches with which instances are failed to deploy (Default - DVS, second cluster-
StandardvSwitch)
> Instance is failing to start :
> 2013-07-09 20:19:58,948 INFO  [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-49:10.102.192.23)
Prepare NIC device based on NicTO: {"deviceId":0,"networkRateMbps":200,"defaultNic":true,"uuid":"2bb4d376-99e8-449b-9b18-ec2f6887daf6","ip":"10.1.1.144","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"10.1.1.1","mac":"02:00:79:e9:00:04","dns1":"10.103.128.15","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Guest","broadcastUri":"vlan://792","isolationUri":"vlan://792","isSecurityGroupEnabled":false,"name":"newdv1,,vmwaredvs"}
> 2013-07-09 20:19:58,953 INFO  [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-49:10.102.192.23)
Prepare network on vmwaresvs P[newdv1:untagged] with name prefix: cloud.guest
> 2013-07-09 20:19:58,981 ERROR [vmware.mo.HypervisorHostHelper] (DirectAgent-49:10.102.192.23)
Unable to find vSwitchnewdv1
> 2013-07-09 20:19:58,981 WARN  [vmware.resource.VmwareResource] (DirectAgent-49:10.102.192.23)
StartCommand failed due to Exception: java.lang.Exception
> Message: Unable to find vSwitchnewdv1
> java.lang.Exception: Unable to find vSwitchnewdv1
>         at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.mo.HypervisorHostHelper.prepareNetwork(HypervisorHostHelper.java:830)
>         at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.resource.VmwareResource.prepareNetworkFromNicInfo(VmwareResource.java:2923)
>         at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.resource.VmwareResource.execute(VmwareResource.java:2687)
>         at com.cloud.hypervisor.vmware.resource.VmwareResource.executeRequest(VmwareResource.java:479)
>         at com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.java:186)
>         at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>         at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>         at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
> 2013-07-09 20:19:58,983 DEBUG [agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache] (DirectAgent-49:null)
Seq 7-1447821361: Response Received

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message