From dev-return-112836-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@cloudstack.apache.org Tue Apr 9 13:26:57 2019 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7AF49180629 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7195 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2019 13:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 7172 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2019 13:07:18 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Apr 2019 13:07:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A428CC1DE8; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:26:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.101 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=li.nux.ro Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngmOuh6y-2L2; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org (mailserver.lastdot.org [31.193.175.196]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5181160D78; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9EA2FE2CB; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id xV_qhnZzYfeR; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 924362FE2CD; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:42 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mailserver.lastdot.org 924362FE2CD DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=li.nux.ro; s=C605E3A6-F3C6-11E3-AEB0-DFF9218DCAC4; t=1554816402; bh=Ju7KrZ3njp7RinbpF9edzhxsJJs1gW3VvUALhM4w8Mw=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=wYpJoAWXxi4n3Xv6f3HRIt64Z52DuM3C42aLOHDUeooHIHIhLyrMODK9n8FBXoWDf N2oF/kRPx7FDkeZKnVMvfrZoTINwP0mcgdsPOYPtHN7azrQCvgFTKPhar9QnO8Zr3h IDhTuz46fQEcHJfJi8VKNnnHg6lMfKTjvnVYbjWQ= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailserver.lastdot.org Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id FF0w_bJHtAWw; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:42 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org (mailserver.lastdot.org [31.193.175.196]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3D022FE2CC; Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:26:40 +0100 (BST) From: Nux! To: dev Cc: users Message-ID: <239388096.8113.1554816400555.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> Subject: Windows on KVM - Windows profile with PV drivers vs Other PV? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.0_GA_1659 (ZimbraWebClient - FF60 (Linux)/8.7.0_GA_1659) Thread-Index: AXgwcJ0hHQbjYVYFiiV58js12ECo9A== Thread-Topic: Windows on KVM - Windows profile with PV drivers vs Other PV? Hi, I'm trying to add some Windows templates to my test cloud and by using the "Windows Server 2016" I end up with Intel 1000 NICs instead of virtio ones; this is a bit suboptimal. When I add the template initially I can see I can specify a type of storage - virtio-scsi is what I need, however I can't do the same for the network devices. What does the community recommend here? Any way to force virtio devices on the Windows Server profile or should I go for "Other PV" profiles for Windows guests? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro