cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Question about 'Deployment Planner'
Date Tue, 09 Apr 2019 10:14:47 GMT
Hi Haijiao,

I would suggest you to update the documentation on this particular thing -
it's a great way to contribute, considering documentation is always lagging
somewhat behind the feature set in CloudStack ?

Best
Andrija

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 10:24, Haijiao <18602198181@163.com> wrote:

> Hi, Wei
>
>
> You rock !    It's exactly what we want.
>
>
> Would suggest community to update the 'deployment planner' part in the
> doc, link to these 2 important global parameters.
>
>
> Thanks again , Wei !
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 在2019年04月09 15时18分, "Wei ZHOU"<ustcweizhou@gmail.com>写道:
>
> Hi Haijiao,
>
> Try the following global configurations
>
> vm.allocation.algorithm = firstfitleastconsumed
> host.capacityType.to.order.clusters = CPU (or RAM)
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
>
> Haijiao <18602198181@163.com> 于2019年4月9日周二 上午8:48写道:
>
> >
> >
> > Even we have ran CloudStack for years,still not quite clear about how
> > 'First Fit'  method exactly works ?
> >
> >
> > It's stated in http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org that if  select 'First
> > Fit' method in 'Deployment Planner',  user shall 'places new VMs on the
> > first host that is found having sufficient capacity to support the VM’s
> > requirements.'
> >
> >
> > The question is
> >
> >
> >     1. in what order CloudStack checks hosts to find out who is  capable
> > to host the new VM ?
> >     2. Is there a method ACS can create the new VM on the host which has
> > less resource utilizatoin, e.g CPU or memory ? That would be particularly
> > useful to balance the host resource utilization among hosts within same
> > cluster.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message