cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] travis tests
Date Sun, 07 Apr 2019 08:51:28 GMT
Ok, I will see if I can split and/or reduce the Travis test jobs. These are
not covering full regression checks anyway and are just indicators to the
most blatant errors in PRs. We'll need to get to a more minimal set of
functionality to include in such a first scan.

bilingual spellchecker used, read at your own risk.

On Sat, 6 Apr 2019, 11:59 Nikolaos Dalezios, <dalezni@gmail.com> wrote:

> I also have noticed this issue with travis tests. After my first PR travis
> was failing in the first test but all the local mvn tests were passed.
> After a PR update travis is now failing at test 7. Specifically the test
> isn' failing it times out but cannot figure it out
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 14:59 Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingartner@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > It is probably a concurrency problem on the test side.
> > I had a similar problem a long time ago with
> > "*smoke*/*test_primary_storage*".
> > That is one of the reasons why this test is there on its own.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 8:54 AM Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LS,
> > > Lately travis tests show more and more random failures. somtimes these
> > > succeed on stuborn retry but lately these are getting more persistent.
> > > Especially job .7 is hard to get past/passed. I am very irritated and
> > > looking for ways to resolve this without just ignoring.
> > > Is there anybody here that has a clear view on shat is happening? I
> heard
> > > say ubuntu verion and travis traffic increasing.
> > > Does anybody know if splitting the runs further is possible and/or
> > useful?
> > >
> > > thanks and kind regards,
> > > --
> > > Daan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafael Weingärtner
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message