cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Voloshanenko Igor <igor.voloshane...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Freezing master for 4.11
Date Mon, 08 Jan 2018 10:22:18 GMT
You again faster than me )))

2018-01-08 12:21 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor <igor.voloshanenko@gmail.com>:

> :D tnx )
> Updated by my colleague already
>
> 2018-01-08 12:06 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>:
>
>> yeah, way ahead of you Igor ;) I asked a question about it
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
>> igor.voloshanenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Updates posted to https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2389
>> > Can you please review?
>> >
>> > 2018-01-08 11:57 GMT+02:00 Voloshanenko Igor <
>> igor.voloshanenko@gmail.com
>> > >:
>> >
>> > > Sure. Got it.
>> > >
>> > > Will post update soon
>> > >
>> > > 2018-01-08 11:38 GMT+02:00 Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > >> Igor, I remember your PR and think it is fine. It can also be argued
>> > that
>> > >> it needs to go in as a security feature. For an RM it is unthinkably
>> > late,
>> > >> but fortunately it is very small. I will however -1 it if it leads
>> to a
>> > >> plethora of last minute PRs to include.
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:33 AM, Voloshanenko Igor <
>> > >> igor.voloshanenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > Guys, can we please include https://github.com/apache/clou
>> > >> dstack/pull/2389
>> > >> > into 4.11
>> > >> > PR very small and updates will be published in next few hours.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > As we have this for a while in production for 4.8 branch.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > 2018-01-08 11:15 GMT+02:00 Boris Stoyanov <
>> > boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
>> > >> >:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > +1 Daan
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
>> > >> > > www.shapeblue.com
>> > >> > > 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
>> > >> > > @shapeblue
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > On 8 Jan 2018, at 10:47, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Rohit, Ivan,
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > I think we can argue that the five open PRs on the milestone
>> can
>> > >> still
>> > >> > go
>> > >> > > > in as long as active work on them continues. I have
not looked
>> at
>> > >> > Ivan's
>> > >> > > > PRs yet but can see they were entered in december and
he is
>> > actively
>> > >> > > > working on it so why not include those in the milestone.
A
>> bigger
>> > >> > concern
>> > >> > > > is that some of the remaining PRs in that milestone
are
>> > potentially
>> > >> > > > conflicting. So we feature freeze now and work only
to get the
>> set
>> > >> list
>> > >> > > in
>> > >> > > > (and blockers).
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
>> > >> > > kudryavtsev_ia@bw-sw.com>
>> > >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >> Rohit, Devs,
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> just consider adding:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10188 / https://github.com/apache/
>> > cloudstack/pull/2362
>> > >> > > [resouce
>> > >> > > >> accounting blocker bug]
>> > >> > > >> CLOUDSTACK-10170 / https://github.com/apache/
>> > cloudstack/pull/2350
>> > >> > > >> [security
>> > >> > > >> fix, enchancement]
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> They are ready (we think so) for some time, but
*no final
>> review*
>> > >> yet.
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> 2018-01-08 14:47 GMT+07:00 Rohit Yadav <
>> > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> > >> >:
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>> All,
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> As per the previously shared schedule [1], by
EOD today (8
>> Jan
>> > >> 2018)
>> > >> > we
>> > >> > > >>> would freeze master after which we'll only accept
>> > critical/blocker
>> > >> > > fixes,
>> > >> > > >>> stabilize master and start a voting thread on
4.11 RC1 (est.
>> by
>> > 15
>> > >> > Jan
>> > >> > > >>> 2018).
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> I wanted to gather consensus if this is acceptable
to
>> everyone
>> > as
>> > >> > there
>> > >> > > >>> are still few outstanding feature PRs that I
understand
>> authors
>> > >> have
>> > >> > > >> worked
>> > >> > > >>> hard to get them in.
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> Please share your thoughts, comments.  If you're
the author
>> of
>> > >> such
>> > >> > an
>> > >> > > >>> existing PR, please work with us, address outstanding
issues.
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> In case of no objections, it will be assumed
that the plan is
>> > >> > > acceptable
>> > >> > > >>> to everyone. Thanks.
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/mszlluye35acvn2j
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> - Rohit
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> <https://cloudstack.apache.org>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
>> > >> > > >>> www.shapeblue.com
>> > >> > > >>> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N
4HSUK
>> > >> > > >>> @shapeblue
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >> --
>> > >> > > >> With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
>> > >> > > >> Bitworks Software, Ltd.
>> > >> > > >> Cell: +7-923-414-1515
>> > >> > > >> WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>> > >> > > >>
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > --
>> > >> > > > Daan
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Daan
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message