cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)
Date Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:38:05 GMT
Thanks Rohit,
That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade
guide.

Bobby.


boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On 19 Jan 2018, at 11:27, Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Hi Bobby,


Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the dynamic roles feature.
But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and if an admin wants to stick to the old static (commands.properties)
way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to the release notes /cc
@Paul Angus<mailto:paul.angus@shapeblue.com>.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org<https://cloudstack.apache.org/>>



________________________________
From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM
To: users
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit,

That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate
this dependency in the upgrade process?

Bobby.


boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/><http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue



On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50, Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Hi Bobby,


I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static checker with commands.properties
work, admins will be required to add/update new API/ACLs in the commands.properties file.

Adding the following to commands.properties file and restarting mgmt server fixes the issue:

quotaIsEnabled=15


Please continue testing, thanks.


- Rohit

<https://cloudstack.apache.org>



________________________________
From: Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.11.0.0 (LTS)

I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11

Here’s the jira id: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10236

I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired
immediately.

Regards,
Boris Stoyanov


boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com<mailto:boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com>
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/><http://www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/>>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue



On 17 Jan 2018, at 8:42, Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com<mailto:Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>>
wrote:

Hi everyone,

For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite
against RC1.

With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed.

Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests.

Once I’ve completed running those, I expect to move on to the XenServer-related managed-storage
tests.

I ran these XenServer and VMware tests just prior to RC1 being created, so I suspect all of
those tests will come back successful.

Now, with regards to the one issue I found on KVM with managed storage:

It relates to a new feature whereby you can online migrate the storage of a VM from NFS or
Ceph to managed storage.

During the code-review process, I made a change per a suggestion and it introduced an issue
with this feature. The solution is just a couple lines of code and only impacts this one use
case. If you are testing this release candidate and don’t really care about this particular
feature, it should not at all impact your ability to test RC1.

Thanks!
Mike

On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Rohit Yadav <rohit@apache.org<mailto:rohit@apache.org>>
wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.11.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.11.0.0-RC20180115T1603
Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.11.0.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

The vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from
1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 and published RC1 repository here:
http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/testing/4.11-rc1

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate
upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for
systemvmtemplate upgrade testing:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/latest/index.html

4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here:
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.11/

Regards,
Rohit Yadav

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message