cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Boris Stoyanov <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack (LTS)
Date Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:38:05 GMT
Thanks Rohit,
That said I must agree it’s not a blocker but still it definitely should be part of upgrade

53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK

On 19 Jan 2018, at 11:27, Rohit Yadav <<>>

Hi Bobby,

Agree, it's not user-friendly which is why admins should migrate to the dynamic roles feature.
But I'm not sure if this is a blocker and if an admin wants to stick to the old static (
way, they need to manage changes themselves. We may add something to the release notes /cc
@Paul Angus<>.

- Rohit


From: Boris Stoyanov <<>>
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:51:32 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack (LTS)

Hi Rohit,

That doesn’t sound much user friendly what do you think? Can we look for a way to automate
this dependency in the upgrade process?

53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK

On 19 Jan 2018, at 10:50, Rohit Yadav <<>>

Hi Bobby,

I checked the 4.5-4.11 upgrade environment, due to the nature of how static checker with
work, admins will be required to add/update new API/ACLs in the file.

Adding the following to file and restarting mgmt server fixes the issue:


Please continue testing, thanks.

- Rohit


From: Boris Stoyanov <<>>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 6:54:28 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack (LTS)

I think I’ve hit a blocker when upgrading to 4.11

Here’s the jira id:

I’ve upgraded from 4.5 to 4.11, then I’ve logged in with admin and got session expired

Boris Stoyanov<><>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK

On 17 Jan 2018, at 8:42, Tutkowski, Mike <<>>

Hi everyone,

For the past couple days, I have been running the KVM managed-storage regression-test suite
against RC1.

With the exception of one issue (more on this below), all of these tests have passed.

Tomorrow I plan to start in on the VMware-related managed-storage tests.

Once I’ve completed running those, I expect to move on to the XenServer-related managed-storage

I ran these XenServer and VMware tests just prior to RC1 being created, so I suspect all of
those tests will come back successful.

Now, with regards to the one issue I found on KVM with managed storage:

It relates to a new feature whereby you can online migrate the storage of a VM from NFS or
Ceph to managed storage.

During the code-review process, I made a change per a suggestion and it introduced an issue
with this feature. The solution is just a couple lines of code and only impacts this one use
case. If you are testing this release candidate and don’t really care about this particular
feature, it should not at all impact your ability to test RC1.


On Jan 15, 2018, at 4:33 AM, Rohit Yadav <<>>

Hi All,

I've created a release, with the following artifacts up for
testing and a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/
Commit: 1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same

PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884):

The vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Additional information:

For users' convenience, I've built packages from
1b8a532ba52127f388847690df70e65c6b46f4d4 and published RC1 repository here:

The release notes are still work-in-progress, but the systemvmtemplate
upgrade section has been updated. You may refer the following for
systemvmtemplate upgrade testing:

4.11 systemvmtemplates are available from here:

Rohit Yadav

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message