cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Tutkowski, Mike" <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack (LTS)
Date Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:12:03 GMT
If all of our testing were completely in an automated fashion, then I would agree that the
72-hour window is sufficient. However, we don’t have that kind of automated coverage and
people aren’t always able to immediately begin testing things out like migrating from their
version of CloudStack to the new one. That being the case, 72 hours does seem (at least for
where we are now as a project in terms of automated testing coverage) a bit short.

On 1/17/18, 7:52 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <> wrote:

    The 72 hours is to make sure all stakeholders had a chance to glance. Testing is supposed
to have happened before. We have a culture of testing only after RC-cut which is part of the
problem. The long duration of a single test run takes, is another part. And finally, in this
case there is the new mindblow called meltdown. I think in general we should try to keep the
72 hours but for this release it is not realistic.
    On 17/01/2018, 15:48, "Rene Moser" <> wrote:
        On 01/17/2018 03:34 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
        > People, People,
        > a lot of us are busy with meltdown fixes and a full component test takes about
the 72 hours that we have for our voting, I propose to extend the vote period until at least
        I wonder where this 72 hours windows come from... Is it just be or,
        based on the amount of changes and "things" to test, I would like to
        expect a window in the size of 7-14 days ...?
    53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK

View raw message