cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Kris Sterckx <kris.ster...@nuagenetworks.net>
Subject Re: 4.11 : Physical networking migration ; Config Drive support
Date Wed, 20 Dec 2017 12:34:30 GMT
+1  we are rebasing our outstanding PR's on daily basis

Totally agree with reviewing other PRs as well; we are doing this already
and will increase those efforts in 2018.

Thanks

kris


On 20 December 2017 at 13:18, Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Kris,
>
>
> With on-going PR review/merging, it is requested to engage in those PRs
> and fix merge conflicts that may happen again as other PRs merge.
>
>
> I would also like to encourage you and other Nuage folks to review other
> PRs and engage on outstanding review comments and questions.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Kris Sterckx <kris.sterckx@nuagenetworks.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2017 2:45:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 4.11 : Physical networking migration ; Config Drive support
>
> Also, both PRs have been (re)rebased today :
>
> Network migration : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2259
> Config Drive : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097
>
> Hope to make these happen.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kris
>
>
>
> On 19 December 2017 at 15:44, Kris Sterckx <kris.sterckx@nuagenetworks.net
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Wido.
> >
> > sorry for late reply.  Thanks, that sounds great.
> >
> > Yes we can move from SS to PS if we accept that once 4.12 is deployed
> with
> > updated code, in order to migrate a particular's VM iso, the VM needs to
> be
> > stopped & restarted. Then the iso will be recreated.
> >
> > My suggestion would be merging in Config drive support and declare as
> > experimental in 4.11 , then people (ops and devs) can use it for
> > experimental use and give feedback and we can further harden it in 4.12
> and
> > declare it as GA.
> > I think any other way won't work.
> >
> > Let me know your view.
> >
> > Thanks, Kris
> >
> >
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
> > On 14 December 2017 at 09:59, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/07/2017 03:17 PM, Kris Sterckx wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would like to raise attention to 2 features which are pending 4.11,
> >>> which
> >>> received great appreciation from some of you and which from Nuage
> >>> perspective we see great interest to from large operators also. They
> are
> >>> :
> >>>
> >>>     - Physical networking migration, or : Migrate networks to a new
> >>> physical
> >>>     network
> >>>     Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10024
> >>>     Design doc :
> >>>     https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Physi
> >>> cal+Networking+Migration
> >>>     PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2259
> >>>     - Config Drive support :
> >>>
> >>>     Jira : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9813
> >>>     Design doc : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9813
> >>>     PR : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2097
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would like to emphasis first that both features are generic
> solutions,
> >>> not tight to any SDN solution whatsoever.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regarding network migration support : to anyone interested in this
> >>> capability, please review the design doc and/or the PR. The more buy-in
> >>> we
> >>> get to this large amount of work we spent to this, the more appraisal
> you
> >>> give to the guys who spent the work. We hope to get this PR merged in
> >>> before end of the year.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regarding config drive support : as already discussed in the Miami
> >>> Collaboration conference in May, this PR gives you fully standard
> >>> cloud-init support using the OpenStack configdrive datasource provider
> >>> and
> >>> it works like a charm. We received very positive feedback to this.
> There
> >>> has been discussion about the storage strategy though and people voted
> >>> for
> >>> storing the iso's at primary storage rather than at secondary storage.
> >>> There has been further work spent on this by Frank Maximus and there
> has
> >>> been some review of that but i am not sure we still want to include
> that
> >>> change still in 4.11. Frankly my proposal would be we take an
> incremental
> >>> approach and start larger validation cycles for the outstanding PR and
> >>> approach further evolution of it in the next release cycle. Open to
> your
> >>> feedback.  In any case I would find it a missed opportunity if config
> >>> drive
> >>> would eventually not find its way into 4.11 at all.  Again, we see
> great
> >>> interest in this.  Potentially we could declare it as experimental
> >>> support,
> >>> to be enabled via an advanced setting - just an idea. In that way more
> >>> people get can a sense of how it works and provide feedback. Another
> item
> >>> to notice is that as Nuage team does not have XenServer deployments, we
> >>> have no facility to verify the PR with XenServer. Helping out on that
> >>> would
> >>> be appreciated also.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> We could do it in two steps indeed. Move to PS in a later stage (if
> >> that's doable?).
> >>
> >> I would love to take a look at this as I'd love to see this feature in
> >> 4.11, but I'm very low on time to actually look at it.
> >>
> >> Wido
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Kris
> >>>
> >>>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message