cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
Date Fri, 14 Jul 2017 07:22:35 GMT
Lotic,


The specific PR has been merged on 4.9 branch and will make its way to future 4.9.3.0 release.


- Rohit

________________________________
From: Lotic Lists <lists@lotic.com.br>
Sent: 13 July 2017 17:47:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi Rohit.

I would suggest the 1829 [1]

It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM (HVM)

[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829


rohit.yadav@shapeblue.comĀ 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 


-----Original Message-----
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 11:42
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

All,


Please send me a list of PRs you would like to see in 4.9.3.0 so we can freeze the scope for
4.9.3.0, no promises but it may be possible to have a release plan as soon as next week.


- Rohit

________________________________
From: Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
Sent: 12 July 2017 01:27:30
To: Rohit Yadav; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)

Hi,

I would suggest: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2131

Serious issue with Ubuntu 16.04 and statistics gathering on KVM.

Wido

> Op 11 juli 2017 om 11:49 schreef Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>:
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> ________________________________
> From: Sean Lair <slair@ippathways.com>
> Sent: 11 July 2017 03:41:17
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> Here are three issues we ran into in 4.9.2.0.  We have been running all of these fixes
for several months without issues.  The code changes are all very easy/small, but had a big
impact for us.
>
> I'd respectfully suggest they go into 4.9.3.0:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2041 (VR related jobs
> scheduled and run twice on mgmt servers)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2040 (Bug in monitoring of
> S2S VPNs - also exists in 4.10)
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1966 (IPSEC VPNs do not work
> after vRouter reboot)
>
> Thanks
> Sean
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 1:14 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] CloudStack 4.9.3.0 (LTS)
>
> All,
>
>
> With 4.10.0.0 voted, I would like to start some initial discussion around the next minor
LTS release 4.9.3.0. At the moment I don't have a timeline, plans or dates to share but I
would like to engage with the community to gather list of issues, commits, PRs that we should
consider for the next LTS release 4.9.3.0.
>
>
> To reduce our test and QA scope, we don't want to consider changes that are new feature,
or enhancements but strictly blockers/critical/major bugfixes and security related fixes,
and we can consider reverting any already committed/merged PR(s) on 4.9 branch (committed
since 4.9.2.0).
>
>
> Please go through list of commits since 4.9.2.0 (you can also run, git log 4.9.2.0..4.9)
and let us know if there is any change we should consider reverting:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.9>I started backporting some fixes
on the 4.9 branch, please go through the following PR and raise objections on changes/commits
that we should not backport or revert:
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2052
>
>
> Lastly, please also share any PRs that we should consider reviewing+merging on 4.9 branch
for the 4.9.3.0 release effort.
>
>
> - Rohit
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com>
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue




Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message