cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Will Stevens <wstev...@cloudops.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Extending Marvin Smoketest Suite
Date Fri, 07 Jul 2017 11:12:18 GMT
I would like to see better testing of 'projects' as well, it is almost
entirely untested.

*Will Stevens*
CTO

<https://goo.gl/NYZ8KK>

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 7:05 AM, Boris Stoyanov <boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I’ve started up this improvement, which is to extend Marvin smoketests
> with some more tests. I’ve indicated a few tests from the component tests
> that I think would be really good to have into smoketests, like for example
> Usage tests ( we don’t have any currently).
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9989
>
>
> Here’s a list of items that I think are suitable candidates:
> test_accounts.py - There are no tests for accounts/users in the current
> suite
> test_host_maintenance.py - We have received reports for multiple failures
> around moving VMs away from a Host set for Maintenance.
> test_regions.py - there are no tests for this in the current suite
> test_usage.py - No tests and this is quite vital to public and private
> cloud providers, CloudStack users rely on this usage metrics and we should
> be testing this on a daily basis.
>
> In the JIRA ticket I’ve added up more details against each group of tests
> since there are some with problems at this stage.
>
> Can you guys please review and add more areas that you would like to be
> smoke tested as part of each PR in the community repo?
>
> Thanks
> Boris Stoyanov
>
> boris.stoyanov@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message