Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74AAA200CB5 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 06:49:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 727BB160BE9; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BA4F1160BDC for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 06:49:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 92230 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2017 04:49:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 92214 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2017 04:49:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C93E01822E2 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.906 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.906 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.626, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuaCkQdez2wL for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com (mail-qt0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E1C205FAE1 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id i2so40913146qta.3 for ; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:49:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tXXmRYGykstQEzQGJutab+VpOSxkTtFeMRqYIcimmj4=; b=jt66P/vMAqf08OFcIAryPDfzlRzM59JaGlYW7NAKybk+BEA0fJPfTDCQKQbXyNpfaq eW9v/U+b8xaerhsuhYFNJBNitN+exNB8VO7O4p/yqzooWm88b4DcsBB0TuWhbETIPbEk 1KxSulVFz19XChWEMZr4OnZQ2gcEpND5s7zc5p/YDnbojfwKYNG5Diywqkff/XBN9xHj t0tbnfrxd7MsVKuhIBTs3VchFsCxqkV7KYw3hSYzUkDkoFTQlUVw1goVB59SYv3MSnmn OoMD47CF+/BEwWbj2c5L0DQLft/vxqvkVUtVQqEKpIcqLtDS7HwHxCnS+h7byVoeV5Qc ouew== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyDnBlCCODSabG0hZzMZaYN3nfp1LgrsevorVYbXfvec40ObmCb LfbYw3tnKEp6EdoFITI= X-Received: by 10.237.48.80 with SMTP id 74mr11483730qte.10.1498625383758; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from missiveapp.local (ec2-54-162-237-11.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [54.162.237.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm902465qkb.33.2017.06.27.21.49.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:42 +0000 From: Rajani Karuturi To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.10.0.0 RC6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Boundary_501_d420c021-e2e0-4c94-9407-c1ceb9a55cc6; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Missive X-Missive-Digest: 80e28ba4dc5e9641ca1a7372c240a9d2 archived-at: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 04:49:50 -0000 --Boundary_501_d420c021-e2e0-4c94-9407-c1ceb9a55cc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Kris, Can you please apply 2162 locally and see if you are OK with the changes? We shouldn't be spending one RC cycle for one issue. Ideally, we should have more CIs running on PRs from different usage perspectives(like managed storage, nuage, basic network, local storage, etc.). That would help uncover issues before they are merged. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On June 27, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Kris Sterckx (kris.sterckx@nuagenetworks.net) wrote: Hi all, I 'm sorry for voting -1 again. Issue : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9980 Caused by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089 Fixed by : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2162 Kris - Nuage Networks On 26 June 2017 at 18:58, Tutkowski, Mike wrote: +1 (binding) I am not concerned about the code changes that went into this RC since the previous RC, so I am still happy with the amount of automated and manual testing that I performed on a previous RC. On 6/25/17, 11:07 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" wrote: Hi All, I've created 4.10.0.0 release with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/ 0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff Commit:0272d1da0ed11ce6c884b05d630e9f46674c58ff Branch: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.10.0.0- RC20170626T1011 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/ SystemVm Templates: http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.10/RC6/ PRs merged since RC4: #2150 and #2089 PRs merged since RC5: revert of #2084 PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Thanks, ~Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/= --Boundary_501_d420c021-e2e0-4c94-9407-c1ceb9a55cc6--