Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D52BF200C6E for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:54:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D3DA3160BC7; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:54:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C553160B99 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:54:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 80724 invoked by uid 500); 8 May 2017 13:54:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 80706 invoked by uid 99); 8 May 2017 13:54:05 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 May 2017 13:54:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C719AC239C for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:54:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.198 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.198 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ena.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybSdPuqRFXZw for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3n.ena.net (smtp3n.ena.net [96.4.1.11]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 005855F568 for ; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01lp0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3n.ena.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A861E1480577; Mon, 8 May 2017 08:53:48 -0500 (CDT) Authentication-Results: smtp.ena.net; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=ena.com Authentication-Results: smtp.ena.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sweller@ena.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ena.com; s=default; t=1494251628; bh=wtit9m5FWPPZ1zeENwxdkkqh8LjTJyH5+UYyzsQZ79A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To; b=dTcHE3AYF98GjG/98lo3ldTkQGCZeA5vmAOpn4buTV71LgCW0Mbc2AIK0OvCeIxNp Q7Mpszb+guxI4f6OWvI1yDcg1Z2rmT8Ny2CIlnC/9XfLd1reqs+8OnrV0Kqv6ti3sm 6gmPpeQYqFS/0e1Rv/ve5NoqwQ+vG3EgFx5Ifio0= Received: from BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.161.152.155) by BN6PR02MB3330.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.161.152.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1075.11; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:53:47 +0000 Received: from BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.152.155]) by BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.152.155]) with mapi id 15.01.1075.019; Mon, 8 May 2017 13:53:47 +0000 From: Simon Weller To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features Thread-Topic: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features Thread-Index: AQHSx9bHr6OAynAfa0eUzjB+DxPwk6HqQgGAgAAOvP2AACRpFw== Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 13:53:47 +0000 Message-ID: References: ,<02a7d486-b97f-4a6c-9513-55238470b4b1@msgid.missiveapp.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: cloudstack.apache.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cloudstack.apache.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ena.com; x-originating-ip: [25.174.119.4] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;BN6PR02MB3330;7:+hhHX76uEUbyr1tAb/RTTxSHLF/Qmmb01CtzYVqKZ1lIONvSJiYdOuo74m5N9ZJ3hOUnirKy4oRgcz59oyydieDISRvr1bYOuq6O1Er/RSOqrdM9gU0WqDaGJynDA0ibm0Z7D94srd+bo5Ca+6o7T1H/uaatO+YV1zlkxxXTLqgByxP962Vhj6IHP8Cgpm+QLNJAcIML+/hw+OMny4VtHcA7edl7d2+OcDrQGWUjhoL0Prdr7erz9T7jEqn87d7jjMiJOI9TTiNLl8lG52Rntv3JX49cnCQDc4JfQBL4EfbuBYGxCSY2UzMxYmKh8wO8W10aqiLT6jPOcvSjd0xAhA== x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8acd4a79-ef92-4364-7739-08d49619a68d x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(201703131423075)(201703031133081);SRVR:BN6PR02MB3330; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(166708455590820); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560025)(6072148);SRVR:BN6PR02MB3330;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN6PR02MB3330; x-forefront-prvs: 0301360BF5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(39400400002)(39840400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39850400002)(24454002)(377454003)(110136004)(15974865002)(74316002)(86362001)(50986999)(606005)(561944003)(76176999)(6506006)(77096006)(1730700003)(81166006)(229853002)(54896002)(6306002)(55016002)(99286003)(236005)(9686003)(6436002)(5640700003)(2950100002)(6916009)(7696004)(189998001)(6606003)(8676002)(8936002)(2501003)(1680700002)(7736002)(3280700002)(7906003)(3660700001)(53386004)(38730400002)(478600001)(53936002)(6246003)(966004)(25786009)(53546009)(54356999)(2900100001)(122556002)(2906002)(19627405001)(2351001)(33656002)(3846002)(102836003)(6116002)(5660300001)(66066001)(200143003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BN6PR02MB3330;H:BN6PR02MB3331.namprd02.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN6PR02MB3331EC2F70235B58177A3601A9EE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: ena.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 May 2017 13:53:47.8095 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 6dc38cd4-4d4f-4826-9649-17854289d170 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN6PR02MB3330 X-ENA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@ena.com for more information X-ENA-MailScanner-ID: A861E1480577.AE98C X-ENA-MailScanner: No viruses found X-ENA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.809, required 4, BAYES_00 -1.90, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, DMARC_PASS -0.01, ENA_RELAY_NOT_US 1.20, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, OS_UNKNOWN 0.00, SPF_HELO_PASS -0.00) X-ENA-MailScanner-From: sweller@ena.com X-ENA-MailScanner-Watermark: 1494856429.6568@px1RF8dHn0vOOdAGYcYemQ archived-at: Mon, 08 May 2017 13:54:08 -0000 --_000_BN6PR02MB3331EC2F70235B58177A3601A9EE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The only PR that is currently showing in blocker status is : https://github= .com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2062 Are there others that should be tagged? - Si ________________________________ From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:43 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features Rajani, Can we have a list of outstanding blockers/issues? I also saw some enhancement PRs merged, which I think we should be avoiding= and instead have our resources spent on fixing the release blockers, thank= s. Regards. ________________________________ From: Rajani Karuturi Sent: 08 May 2017 16:20:01 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] branch on first RC and open up master for features I disagree. The release process is taking long because we dont have enough people working on the release. Sometimes, even the blockers don't get enough attention. There is no point in adding features on already broken/blocked master which is not releasable. "un-freezing" master for new features shouldn't be the goal in my opinion. We should move towards faster releases/release cycles. Thanks, ~ Rajani http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/ On May 8, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Daan Hoogland (daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com) wrote: LS, In a lot of occasions, we have seen new features that are waiting for releases with blocker bugs and while these bugs certainly must be solved, users that are not hindered by those bugs directly are stopped by them. Therefore, I propose we will fork on the first RC branches for future releases, so that development is not stopped for it. If the release process takes too long and to nice features get merged in between we can always decide to re-branch before releasing. Thoughts..? Daan daan.hoogland@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com ( http://www.shapeblue.com ) 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London WC2N 4HSUK @shapeblue --_000_BN6PR02MB3331EC2F70235B58177A3601A9EE0BN6PR02MB3331namp_--