cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2
Date Thu, 18 May 2017 09:19:05 GMT
All,


Other than Mike's blocker fix #2098, do we have any other outstanding issues blocking the
4.10.0.0 release?


Regards.

________________________________
From: Tutkowski, Mike <Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com>
Sent: 12 May 2017 01:53:44
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Will Stevens; Wido den Hollander
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.10.0.0 - RC2

Hi Rajani,

I opened the following PR (against master) to fix the blocker CLOUDSTACK-9917:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2098

Thanks!
Mike

On 5/10/17, 10:40 PM, "Rajani Karuturi" <rajani@apache.org> wrote:

    Thanks for testing Mike.

    RC3=RC2+PR#2089+Mike'sPR

    Any other additions?

    ~ Rajani

    http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

    On May 10, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
    (Mike.Tutkowski@netapp.com) wrote:

    I've been running regression tests against the release candidate.

    So far, all tests but one have passed.

    The failing test is related to the storage cleanup thread. It
    looks like some code was changed in 4.10 with regards to this
    thread and that change is causing a problem around cleanup for
    managed storage in a particular situation.

    As a result of this, I was going to vote -1.

    I'm guessing the fix will not be complicated, but is important.

    I don't yet have the fix, however. Once I do, I can reply to
    this thread.

    On May 10, 2017, at 5:47 AM, Rajani Karuturi <rajani@apache.org>
    wrote:

    I agree to your concerns Wido. I did check the PR before
    creating
    RC2. There were some outstanding comments on it.

    If no one has started testing RC2 and there are no objections,
    we
    can cancel this vote, quickly merge the PR and create RC3.

    ~ Rajani

    http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/

    On May 10, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Wido den Hollander (wido@widodh.nl)
    wrote:

    Op 10 mei 2017 om 0:33 schreef Will Stevens
    <williamstevens@gmail.com>:

    Just to clarify. Wido, the issue you are experiencing is only
    with basic
    networks and also exists in 4.9 right? The issue becomes
    noticeable when
    you have a lot of networks. Is that a fair statement?

    Well, the provisioning is the same between Basic and Advanced.
    The VR is utterly slow in doing that.

    It happens when you have a lot of VMs in those networks.

    In our case we have a couple of thousands VMs.

    What I'd like to prevent is that this is merged into 4.9.3, but
    is not in 4.10.

    However, I don't want to delay 4.10 any longer.

    Wido

    On May 9, 2017 5:39 PM, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@widodh.nl>
    wrote:

    +0

    I don't want to VOTE -1 due to a bug we are facing, but for us
    4.10 would
    be a problem due to the VR performance.

    A PR is open for this, but I also don't want to delay 4.10 any
    longer:
    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2089

    Technically the VR works, it is just that deployment is utterly
    slow.

    Wido

    Op 9 mei 2017 om 7:31 schreef Rajani Karuturi
    <rajani@apache.org>:

    Hi All,

    I've created a 4.10.0.0 release, with the following artifacts up
    for a

    vote:

    Git Branch and Commit SH:
    https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=

    fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204

    Commit:fadc80d50f9e95012c9ff3644b60b600c6f65204
    Branch: 4.10.0.0-RC20170509T1030

    Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
    same
    location):
    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.10.0.0/

    PGP release keys (signed using CBB44821):
    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

    Vote will be open for 72 hours.

    For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure
    to

    indicate

    "(binding)" with their vote

    [ ] +1 approve
    [ ] +0 no opinion
    [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

    ~Rajani
    http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/


rohit.yadav@shapeblue.comĀ 
www.shapeblue.com
53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London  WC2N 4HSUK
@shapeblue
  
 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message